Which action best maintains alignment between strategy and resources?

• A. Conducting a Feasibility Review
• B. Skipping Resource Assessment
• C. Approving All Initiatives
• D. Delaying Decisions Indefinitely

Answer: (A)

Maintaining alignment between strategy and resources hinges on validating that what you plan to do can actually be funded, staffed, and timed to deliver the intended outcomes. A feasibility review does exactly that: it assesses whether proposed initiatives are technically possible, financially viable, and operationally achievable within current capabilities and constraints. It looks at cost, benefits, risks, required skills, dependencies, and timing, so you can adjust scope, reallocate resources, or deprioritize initiatives before commitments are made. This prevents overreaching beyond what resources can support and keeps strategic ambitions tethered to reality.

Skipping a resource assessment leaves gaps hidden until later, when overruns or delays become visible and misalignment already occurred. Approving every initiative ignores resource limits and tends to fragment attention and funding, pulling resources away from higher-priority goals. Delaying decisions indefinitely stalls progress and lets drift widen between strategy and what resources actually allow. A feasibility review provides timely, structured insight that preserves alignment and enables informed, responsible resource decisions.